{"id":818,"date":"2014-09-25T09:01:37","date_gmt":"2014-09-25T08:01:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.cobcm.net\/?p=818"},"modified":"2014-09-25T09:03:07","modified_gmt":"2014-09-25T08:03:07","slug":"el-top-50-cientifico-en-twitter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/2014\/09\/25\/el-top-50-cientifico-en-twitter\/","title":{"rendered":"El \u00abtop 50\u00bb cient\u00edfico en Twitter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/32014\/09\/twitter-ciencia.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/32014\/09\/twitter-ciencia.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"twitter-ciencia\" width=\"600\" height=\"224\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-819\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2014\/09\/twitter-ciencia.jpg 600w, https:\/\/cobcm.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2014\/09\/twitter-ciencia-300x112.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>La revista <em>Science<\/em> ha publicado el \u00abtop 50\u00bb de los cient\u00edficos que cuentan con m\u00e1s seguidores en Twitter. La lista la encabeza un <strong>astrof\u00edsico, Neil deGrasse Tyson (@neiltyson)<\/strong>, con 2.400.000 <em>followers<\/em>. Pero desde COBCM hemos comprobado que tambi\u00e9n abundan los bi\u00f3logos. Sin ir m\u00e1s lejos, el puesto 3 le corresponde a <strong>Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins), con 1.020.000 seguidores<\/strong>. Tambi\u00e9n comunican su ciencia de manera destacada usando 140 caracteres el neurocient\u00edfico Sam Harris (@SamHarrisOrg), en el s\u00e9ptimo puesto, y el bi\u00f3logo Paul Zachary \u00abPZ\u00bb Myers (@pzmyers), conocido entre otras cosas por ser autor del blog de ciencia <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/pharyngula\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pharyngula<\/a> (en d\u00e9cima posici\u00f3n). El neur\u00f3logo <strong>Oliver Sacks<\/strong> (@OliverSacks) y el genetista Eric Topol (@EricTopol) tambi\u00e9n son voces muy sonadas en Twitter. <\/p>\n<p>La <strong>lista completa<\/strong> la puedes encontrar aqu\u00ed: http:\/\/news.sciencemag.org\/scientific-community\/2014\/09\/top-50-science-stars-twitter#full-list<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La revista Science ha publicado el \u00abtop 50\u00bb de los cient\u00edficos que cuentan con m\u00e1s seguidores en Twitter. La lista<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,10],"tags":[20,7,41],"class_list":["post-818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-investigacion","category-recursos","tag-ciencia","tag-neurociencia","tag-twitter"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/818"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=818"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/818\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":821,"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/818\/revisions\/821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cobcm.net\/blogcobcm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}